autodesk autocad architecture 2008 fundamentals

While back here someone is ticked off for a roof that contains many slopesīut is off a fraction so gives the computer a lot of number crunching toĬonsidering that everything is in one model in Revit how come it can produceĮlevations and sections without a murmur? On another forum someone is asking if Revit can deal with some monstrous Softdesk's Architectural add on which is now ADT, & ACA.

I'm coming from more than 20 years of working with Autocad, Autocad & I have been on Revit for a little over a year now and love it. All IĬan tell you is to try the trial version of Revit and do several of the The ground uparound its own engine that handles things differently. Remember ACA was built over time using autocad as the engine so youīasically have to work under it's confines whereas Revit was designed from But open it up to opinions and you have a whole mess of anybody who can say anything and not have to back it up. the one he gets the best margins on.ĭiscussion groups are a great resource when used for precise support questions. They poster saying 'yeah, easy' might really be a salesperson who has no idea of your true needs or any intent to get the proper product in your hands vs. When posting in a discussion group you rarely have any idea of the level of training a person might have / not have and rarely are you comparing apples to apples.Īlso, you never know who is responding. Then beyond all of that you have the much larger case of skill levels. On the Revit side it is a much newer product (under the Autodesk banner) and possibly has not had the time on market for all of it's 'blemishes' to show up.

Therefore, they have had more time to go through the program and find the items that do not work as well when things get complex. Many in this group have been using ACA since it was first released as ADT.

Some of that may have to the with the maturity of the userbase.

Autodesk autocad architecture 2008 fundamentals